PAy attn. No one had any at hand in Lexington and Concord.
"I'm curious about where you two got your belief that the 2nd was written to enable restrictions on the ownership of weapons or destructive devices known to an 18th century soldier."
Try exercising your curiosity and go find where I said anything like that.
"Sounds like the discredited book -- "Arming America, The Origins of a National Gun Culture" By MICHAEL A. BELLESILES."
I'd say your post was generated using the same techniques that he did. Have some coffee and wake up.
PAy attn. No one had any at hand in Lexington and Concord.
Immaterial. Private cannon were available, and they were used to fight.
I'm curious about where you two got your belief that the 2nd was written to enable restrictions on the ownership of weapons or destructive devices known to an 18th century soldier.
Try exercising your curiosity and go find where I said anything like that.
At 106 you supported the concept that "no one had any at hand". That same idea sounds like the discredited book -- "Arming America, The Origins of a National Gun Culture" By MICHAEL A. BELLESILES.
I'd say your post was generated using the same techniques that he did. Have some coffee and wake up.
I think that most here have already 'woke up' to where you stand on gun rights. You stand for "background checks".