Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RasterMaster

“When they are arming our enemies with the technology provided, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with “free trade”.”

Correct, which is why you should NOT be opposed to trade relations with these countries! The 2 are not synonymous.
Trade is good, it doesnt harm us!

I’ve worked with Chinese citizens and know the technology transfer rules that you have to comply with, etc. We can trade with China without giving away the store.


60 posted on 10/23/2007 10:05:58 PM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG

“We can trade with China without giving away the store.”

Not when a Clinton is doing the “trading”....


On the Question of Free Trade (look who also loved free trade, the enemy of capitalism, Marx)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1552448/posts


Reagan’s REAL record of “free trade” (Harley Davidson and Semiconductors):

“Sure, he was a free trader who wanted too open up trade, but he always sought first to protect the sovereignty of the United States and its manufacturing base. He did not confuse free trade with giving the store away.”

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22797


Chinese are our enemy, not an ally...should NEVER be a “trading partner”. That is, unless you work for Loral and don’t mind it when our technology is used against us on the battlefield.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=14497


62 posted on 10/23/2007 10:23:00 PM PDT by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson