Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Still Thinking

Well that’s monkey see monkey do. One printer company includes some stupid software that replicates Windows functionality, then one computer magazine includes that in the list of “features” when comparing various printers and of course nobody else has that checkmark and now EVERYBODY adds that to their next round of drivers.

It’s all about the checkboxes and the need to be all things to all people.


147 posted on 07/24/2008 4:17:39 PM PDT by boogerbear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: boogerbear

Again, it’s not the availability of the “software”, it’s being forced to use it, when it uses resources, doesn’t actually do anything I need, and being closed source could have any amount of spyware in it without me knowing.


148 posted on 07/24/2008 4:23:29 PM PDT by Still Thinking (This post formatted with htmlExtra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

To: boogerbear
See, all the reasons you've mentioned would still be satisfied if they designed the hardware to look like a network share, so that knowledgeable/paranoid geeks like me could use it via normal networking.

That still wouldn't stop them from writing software to satisfy clueless customers who think useless software burning RAM and CPU time and phoning home without providing any actual functionality is a good thing to have. Then they could even sell it to you for $9.95 online instead of giving it away for free with the printer like now. Or still give it away if they're afraid of PC Mag giving them a rash for selling separately.

150 posted on 07/24/2008 4:28:59 PM PDT by Still Thinking (This post formatted with htmlExtra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson