[JrsyJack]

Heard an interview from an FBI or DOD representative once. Elected officials are rarely screened for security clearance. There is no Constitutional requirement for it and the FBI's position, rightfully so, is that they cannot stand in the way of the people's choice.

Unfortunately it is up to the press to help the people vet those that run for elected office but that rarely goes both ways, as recent events have shown.

[doc1019]

cannot stand in the way of the people's choice.

If a majority number of voters elect someone to public office (despite their history, political stance or general proclivities that might offend the minority voters) … the people have spoken and nothing can stand in the way (constitutionally). ;-)