[gogogodzilla]

You have no idea what elections are for. I suggest getting a lesson in civics.

Elections are there for voters to vote for a candidate that most closely matches the ideals, policies, and values of that voter. End of story.

And if you don’t do this, your vote is wasted - as you will have voted for a candidate that *DOESN’T* represent you.

[SeekAndFind]

You have no idea what elections are for. I suggest getting a lesson in civics.

Elections are there for voters to vote for a candidate that most closely matches the ideals, policies, and values of that voter. End of story.

Which rulebook in the constitution tells us that this has to be the case ?

If by "most closely matches", you mean which of the two most likely to win more closely matches a conservatives' ideals and policies, then I'd say McCain meets the criteria.

It may not be 100%, but heck, it meets the "more closely matches" criteria. It's better than close to zero and taking a chance on the destruction of your country for the next 4 years.

[org.whodat]

You have no idea what elections are for. I suggest getting a lesson in civics.

Elections are there for voters to vote for a candidate that most closely matches the ideals, policies, and values of that voter. End of story.

And if you don’t do this, your vote is wasted - as you will have voted for a candidate that *DOESN’T* represent you.

Well said!!

[A_Tradition_Continues]

Elections are there for voters to vote for a candidate that most closely matches the ideals, policies, and values of that voter. End of story.

So what you're saying is that instead of bending over and grabbing your ankles you should bend over and grab your knees. Sorry that's just not my style.