Three years form the time the fraud was known or should have known of the fraud.
That’s my question too. Why didn’t Obama show the long form birth certificate instead of the Certification of Live Birth posted on his web site?
In my opinion it’s not because he wasn’t born in Hawaii. He probably was. It’s because there is something else on it that would greatly embarrass him, and could show him to be a fraud and raise lots of questions about his entire life story. What could that be?
1) How about that Barack H. Obama, Sr. is not listed as the father! That would show us all that he truly is a fraud and his whole “journey to find his roots” that he mentions in his two books was totally bogus. His father may be listed as some one of dubious character like Frank Marshall Davis, or someone else with socialist/communist roots.
2) How about the father listed as ‘unknown’. This again tells us he and his books are frauds, unless his mother, later in life, told B. H. Obama that Obama Sr. was the father. That’s why he took his name.
If by chance his father is listed as someone other than Obama Sr., and that man was an American citizen, and Obama was truly born in Hawaii, then Obama would be a natural-born citizen and eligible for President. Just a fraud.
Now if his father is listed as ‘unknown’, and he truly was born in Hawaii, I believe that Obama would still be considered a natural-born citizen, but the courts would probably have to make that call.
And even though he may be eligible for POTUS he would be shown to be a fraud of grand proportions foisted on the American people by his willing accomplice, the DNC!