Well, no the President doesn't have the authority to specifically instruct a State governor to seal and hide a document that was issued by that State and has no on the federal gov't, does he? This seems to be a case of the Hawaii governor going along with something she didn't have to, but CHOSE to....
I agree that there is something suspicious going on here. I don't think it's that he doesn't have a birth certificate. Now, there may well be something ON the birth certificate that Obama and his people don't want made known.
I thought they could only release the BC if the person in question (Obama in this case) gave permission. I don’t think this has anything to do with him being President Elect, I thought that was HI state law.
At any rate, it seems clear (to me) that there is something he doesn’t want seen. I initially thought maybe his parents were not married, but really, in today’s world, would that really be an issue? I don’t know what else it could be.
“Well, no the President doesn’t have the authority to specifically instruct a State governor to seal and hide a document that was issued by that State and has no on the federal gov’t, does he? This seems to be a case of the Hawaii governor going along with something she didn’t have to, but CHOSE to....”
I’m afraid you misunderstood what I meant. She is bound by law to NOT release that document without the express permission of Barack Obama unless a court of law orders it. Now since no court of law has, she is BOUND to not release it. She SEALED it to protect tampering. But she is not releasing it because she can’t unless ordered by court, or Obama.
This isn’t an issue of Barack having governmental authority, this is an issue of a human resources law prohibiting releasing private documents. This is a PERSON law that Obama has as the right of a PERSON. Not the right as in governmental authority.