I've heard of the doctrine of papal infallibility in the Roman Catholic church, but I've never heard of the doctrine of Democrat leadership infallibility in American law.
...unless someone can bring a compelling case that the certificate is fraudulent.
The certificate need not be proven fraudulent, i. e., that Pelosi signed it with the foreknowledge that it was false, but only need be proven false as to Obama's alleged qualifications.
justiceseeker93 wrote:You are correct, I slightly overstated that part.
The certificate need not be proven fraudulent, i. e., that Pelosi signed it with the foreknowledge that it was false, but only need be proven false as to Obama's alleged qualifications.
The key is, someone with proof will have to establish that there are errors and falsehoods in the certificate that Pelosi signed. The burden of proof will be on whoever alleges that the certificate is inaccurate.
That point is lost on most of the people who are challenging his eligibility.
The certificate signed by Pelosi is adequate proof that he's eligible, unless someone else comes forward with compelling evidence to the contrary.