Your contempt for science and scientists does credit to neither God nor Jesus Christ. I think your denial springs out of prideful conceit, not humility and faith.
I am humble enough to accept that if God used evolution to form me from such a lowly creature as an ape or a chimp, then that's how He did it. He gave us the Bible to tell us how to adapt anytime, anyplace -- how to treat each other -- so that we may thrive instead of perish as have and always will those societies of pagans and child sacrificers that ignore God's word. It all seems pretty consistent to me. You, on the other hand, are so prideful that you reserve the right to reject His miracles as you see fit.
Not accepting the interpretation of the fossil record that scientists use to support the ToE does not equate to *contempt for science*. The theory of evolution is not all science.
I am humble enough ....
Not if you have to tell people how humble you are.
What miracles is he rejecting? He was talking about the ToE and human evolution. If that's considered a miracle, then it can't be considered science.
If it's considered science by all standards evos use to define science, then it can't be called a miracle.
[[Your contempt for science and scientists does credit to neither God nor Jesus Christ. I think your denial springs out of prideful conceit, not humility and faith.]]
And your failures to bring anything relavent showing macroevolution is a reality to the table does even less for your cause. ‘Denial’? Lol- Try reasonability and understanding.
[[I am humble enough]]
Well pat yourself on the back for being so ‘humble’ and outspoken and self-professing abotu your humility
[[to accept that if God used evolution to form me from such a lowly creature as an ape or a chimp, then that’s how He did it.]]
And God looked around the animal kingdom and He found NO suitable mate for Adam- Are you inferrign that you don;’t Beleive God’s word and think that He instructed His people to write lies?
[[You, on the other hand, are so prideful that you reserve the right to reject His miracles as you see fit.]]
Which ‘miracle’ is he rejecting? The miracle of hte biologically impossible Macroevolutionary Hypothesis that has NO scientific evidence to support it? That miracle? For indeed it would HAVE to be a miracle- perpetrated By nature- Violating it’s own laws, and supernaturally overcoming biological impossibilites. Yes Finny- We’re all just ‘deniers’- those who don’t bow down at the silly alter of Darwin are just ‘deniers and haters’ who apparently are so ‘full of pride’ that we don’t follow hte hseep and simply take the word of Macroevos at face value without ever questionign hte scientific validity of their wild fatnastical claims
Good point. Well said.