Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: John Semmens
“A purely voluntary system is inequitable,” Rangel answered.

Get you mind around that illogical BS if you can. What Rangel really wants is to get out of his tax mess. If Obama can do it for the Secretary of the Treasury, he can do it for a brother, a democrat, a valuable legislator. What's a little misprision of a felony among politicians.

12 posted on 01/19/2009 4:42:01 PM PST by Rapscallion (Where is Judge Dread when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rapscallion
What Rangel really wants is to get out of his tax mess.

No, Charlie was proposing this almost two years ago, long before his tax problems, as a way of embarassing the Bush Administration.

For entirely wrong reasons, however, Charlie is right. 100% of the burden of defending America is falling on 0.3% (.003) of the population. You know in your heart that that's not fair.

And knock off all the arguments that it's a voluntary force, and the military professionals don't want troublemakers, blah blah blah. Everybody has an obligation to contribute to our protection. Just by saying your're "supporting the troops" won't cut it as you head on down to the mall.

We need a draft, and the drafting priority will be based on family income and net worth, except for all politicians and their families, who go right to the top of the list.

If they want to run the country, they're going to have to serve it first. These families (Kennedy, Clinton, Bush, Reid, etc) think their families have a right of succession to political office. Well add in a right to military service for them also.

17 posted on 01/19/2009 4:59:42 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson