Posted on 05/27/2009 1:20:52 PM PDT by Maelstorm
Dr. Judith Reisman, expert on Alfred Kinsey, the "father" of the American sexual revolution, has a new piece in Salvo magazine:
... [W]hen Al Kinsey's Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) hit the nation, it did not just cause a sexual revolution, it caused a sex science revolution.
Kinsey's sex "findings" displaced the common law and Judeo-Christian theories of human sexuality, which had dictated our conduct, culture, and sex-crime penalties. The ideals of delayed rewards, complete abstinence before and fidelity within marriage, said Kinsey, were scientifically false, constraining, repressing, and, (most condemnatory), "hypocritical."
The test of a good scientific theory is its predictability. Kinsey predicted that when people believed his theories and data, divorce, venereal disease, "illegitimacy," sex crimes, and all sexual dysfunctions would decrease. You many have noticed that Kinsey's predictions didn't quite pan out. The science was bad....
We gutted our sex laws and changed our sexual behavior to fit the lusts of a team of Indiana University sexual psychopaths posing as scientists. It is time for Congress to investigate the Kinsey sex science fraud. Based on post-1950s hard data, the old sexual science was healthier for society. We had fewer sex offenders and therefore significantly fewer sex offender recidivists to argue about. Or to erase.
Speaking of Kinsey, also just out is The Kinsey Syndrome, a documentary:
This documentary shows how The Kinsey Reports have been used to change the laws concerning sex crimes in America, resulting in the minimal sentences so often given to rapists and pedophiles. Further explained is that the Kinsey data laid the foundation for sex education -- training teachers, psychologists and even Catholic priests in human sexuality. What has been the consequence? And what was Kinsey's research really based upon?
Working secretly in his attic, Dr. Kinsey was one of America's original pornographers. His influence inspired Hugh Hefner to launch Playboy magazine - the "soft" approach to porn - which in time would escalate the widespread use of pornography through magazines, cable TV and the Internet....
Perhaps most disturbing, Alfred Kinsey has been accused of training pedophiles to work with stopwatches and record the responses of children being raped - all in the name of "science." Among his workers was a Nazi pedophile...
Here's the trailer for The Kinsey Syndrome...
THE KINSEY SYNDROME
View Trailer
Why are America's children disappearing? Why must parents live in fear that their children will be molested, abducted, or worse? Parents live in a state of continual fear. No longer do mothers worry about little Johnny coming home late for dinner - they must wonder if he will come home at all. But how did our country reach this point?
The Kinsey Syndrome unfolds the work and influence of Dr. Alfred Kinsey, considered to be "the father of the sexual revolution." But did Kinsey liberate America from its prudish view of sex? Or help to unleash the horrors of our present society?http://www.kinseysyndrome.com/
Indiana’s most infamous person ever!! A pedophile of the worse sort and they called it research!!
ping for later
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
Even got an “Institute” named after him with a huge porn collection. Whata guy! (gag)
Hyperbole? You might think so, considering the praise heaped upon Kinsey by the Left and the media, for generations. But just about everything we were taught about Kinsey was a lie. The biggest? The "fact" that 10% of the population is homosexual. This "fact" came from Kinsey's study of prisoners, not exactly a representative sample of the population.
Like Pete Townshend
The liberal Protestant theologian Paul Tillich was heavily involved in pornography and S&M - I vaguely recall that he was influenced by or knew Kinsey, but I don’t remember the details.
Like Pete Townshend
Micheal Jackson?
According to Kinsey, 8% of males and 4% of females have engaged in sexy with animals.
That's because sex is a moral issue, something (morals) that many scientists would think falls outside the realm of scientific research because it's metaphysical; not part of the natural, material universe.
Don't sell Indiana short. Jim Jones was also born here.
A Personal Odyssey to the Truth
By Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D.I have been asked to introduce myself so that you know something of my life and how I came to discover Kinsey's child molestation protocol, his false data, his molding of modern sex education and of western sexual culture and conduct, as well as how I came be involved in international governmental hearings on science fraud, child sexual abuse, pornography, drugs and the other critical issues of our time. I will try to touch on the points in my life which may be of most use to readers of this Kinsey expose.
I was born, Judith Ann Gelernter, in 1935 in Newark, New Jersey...
Dad would often remind me that "Gelernter" means "the learned one" in German, a name of distinction bequeathed to my ancestors. "Your life should be an honor to your name," he would say...
I lived at a wonderful time. My mother welcomed me home every day and my father supported anything I did. I was safe among neighbors, uncles or cousins due to the delightfully repressive influence of the time. I married, and the hedge of protection about my life was not breached until 1966 when my 10-year-old daughter was molested by a 13-year-old adored and trusted family friend. She told him to stop, but he persisted. He knew she would like it, he said, he knew from his father's magazines, Playboy, the only "acceptable" pornography of the time. The boy left the country a few weeks later, after it came to light that my daughter was but one of several neighborhood children he had raped, including his own little brother. My heart was broken for all the families involved.
This appalling event in our lives, I would learn later, was a pattern with juvenile sex offenders, as they are known in law enforcement circles.
I might never have known anything about her violation, except that my daughter slipped into a deep depression. Only after I promised not to call the police would she talk about what happened. After assuring her this was not her fault, I called my dependable, staid aunt who listened sympathetically and declared, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. Children are sexual from birth." Stunned, I replied that my child was not seeking sex, and called my Berkeley school chum, Carole, who counseled, "Well Judy, she may have been looking for this herself. You know children are sexual from birth." I wondered at this same locution from two such different people so separated geographically. I recognized an ideological "party line." I did not know it then, but as a young mother, I had entered the world according to Kinsey. I would hear and read that "children are sexual from birth" often again. But finaly I would uncover the hidden circumstances surrounding its source.
Interesting and catchy... I’m gonna read the whole thing now.
If anything shows the depth of evil that psychology has wrought on our society this is it.
His training didn't even rise to that low standard. He had a Ph.D. in zoology, although his pseudo-scientific exploits are generally lumped in with psychology and sociology. His work would be better categorized under "Great Frauds of the 20th Century."
There’s a background story to Kinsey, in that he did not just emerge in a vacuum, but was intentionally used to overthrow a decadent existing regime, that was in its own way repugnant.
To start with, Indiana University was intentionally built in the “backwater” of Bloomington, as a seminary school. It was done so to isolate the students from the “big city” of Indianapolis. Academics and scholarship were unimportant, most faculty were unqualified and frankly, corrupt, and its intent was to support an oppressive social structure in that part of the country, by creating a new generation of “social-religious leaders”.
For generations, the towns, if not the cities, in the region had a shadow government led by a minister and his clique of followers that enforced the social order. This included segregation of the races into different parts of town, social and government preferences based on a particular dominant religious sect, control over marriage, education, and to a great extent business. It was a dishonest and prejudicial system based on favoritism and had been in decline for years.
What brought about change were two things. The first was Mr. Herman B. Wells, and expert of banking and finance in the State, who became acting president of Indiana University. The second was the return of veterans from World War II.
Wells single handedly turned IU into a world class institution, a move that was bitterly opposed by the old regime, as they saw it, correctly, as a move both to undermine their power and to introduce a high quality, secular, or at least non-denominational, education to the Protestant students of the State (the Catholics having Notre Dame).
The World War II veterans fully supported Wells, and utterly despised the old regime, refusing to allow it to dictate their lives. Instead, their interests were to get a good college education, get married, and become prosperous. Something the old system would not have permitted unless it had dictated.
But the biggest point of leverage the old regime had over Wells was creating public fear that by improving IU, Wells was turning it into a den of vice, where young women would be prostituted to the lustful veterans. I might add that at the time, the newspapers were full of stories implying that WWII vets had returned, trained to be “rapists and killers”. The media...
So Wells, never one to shrink from a fight, decided to meet them head on, by renting space on the campus to Kinsey. Importantly, at no time was Kinsey actually under the auspices of IU, so could not be shut down by the State legislature, even under heavy pressure. And second, though incredibly provocative, Kinsey was seen, even by the students at IU, as a joke more than serious researcher.
What was not anticipated, was the resounding cultural impact Kinsey would have far beyond the State or even region. Nobody at the time realized that much of America actually *was* wanting a “sexual revolution”. Kinsey was, in effect, “preaching to a choir”. The public wanted to hear what he had to say, even if it was utter hogwash, which to a great extent, it was.
Though it was made many years later, the movie “The Love God” (1969), starring of all people, Don Knotts, as a pseudo Hugh Hefner, managed to convey the mood well. The public wanted a change in the culture, but the law was far behind the times in what was permitted.
This befell the original Hugh Hefner as well, as any expression of personal sexual freedom was strongly condemned, yet the public was fed up with dictates about their personal lives.
Kinsey was, indeed, a pervert and a sap. His works were nonsense, and his legacy, disgusting. But at the time, he was a useful tool to start a cultural revolution that was ready to happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
