Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/10/2009 6:25:52 PM PDT by Michael Eden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael Eden

Excellent read.


2 posted on 06/10/2009 6:27:40 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

He hated and ranted about Israel, Bush, ‘neocons’, and Zionism. He said Christians ruined the Roman empire, he was a 9/11 truther...

He sounds more like Rosie O’Donnell’.


3 posted on 06/10/2009 6:28:48 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
White supremacists are fascists/socialists - on the spectrum of no government (anarchy) to total government, they are ground zero for total government.

Closer to 0bama than any patriotic American I know of.

4 posted on 06/10/2009 6:29:58 PM PDT by Bosco (Remember how you felt on September 11?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
The Right Racism Myth
5 posted on 06/10/2009 6:32:15 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

He’s just a radical, you know, like Bill Ayers.


8 posted on 06/10/2009 6:36:42 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Thanks for writing this. We cannot let the left define terms for us.


9 posted on 06/10/2009 6:37:16 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I've conquered my goddam willpower." Don Marquis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Here’s the government/media/leftist rule:

If they’re violent, they’re right wing extremists.


13 posted on 06/10/2009 6:54:54 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Brunn was obviously a right wing nut. Right wing is the nazi-like-facist side. Commie-socialists are the left wing. Brunn was more of a nazi than commie.

I’m not real sure who first set this out, but if the universe is curved stuff is right, then left and right will meet somewhere sometime but that depends on whether the cat lives or dies.

parsy, who is an expert on this kind of fuzzy stuff.


14 posted on 06/10/2009 6:59:03 PM PDT by parsifal ("Knock and ye shall receive!" (The Bible, somewhere.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Good points all. The coverage of this is bizarre, but then, what would you expect. In addition, I think Obama’s disruptive and disturbing policies are stirring up the nuts in general.


22 posted on 06/10/2009 7:22:24 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Only Leftists need to generalize everyone into group associations. This guy acted on his own. Anyone who generalizes him across sixty million other law abiding citizens is only trying to create a political movement to criminalize those sixty million people - and history shows that’s exactly what the Left does.

Of course, if a Muslim, say, just starts shooting at some soldiers, then of course the Muslim acted on his own. But that’s an obvious exception, so Leftists don’t bother mentioning it.


23 posted on 06/10/2009 7:25:30 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

A lot of confusion goes back to the European (especially French) definitions, where the whole left/right terminology started. Right generally meant monarchist/statist/class based social tradition. Conservatism meant upholding that status quo. Left meant classic liberalism, social equality, seperation of church and state, etc.

In America the European style right were the Tories, and they left after the Revolution. The country was founded on the classic liberalism of Locke and Jefferson. Conservatism in America meant conserving the classic liberal values on which the country was founded.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the left in both Europe and America changed from libalism to Marxism and other forms of socialism. Classic liberals in Europe became the middle, and in America, conservatives ironically became the sole defenders of classic liberalism.

Fascicm in Europe became associated with the right because of it’s statist authoritarianism. So neo-fascists in America are generally lumped in with “the right” because of that. They really don’t have anything to do with either the mainstream right or the left in America though.


29 posted on 06/10/2009 7:41:24 PM PDT by Hugin (GSA! (Goodbye sweet America))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden
Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism, cited in this piece, is a great read. It explains the close ties between fascism and socialism in authoritarian regimes.
35 posted on 06/10/2009 8:31:24 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael Eden

Great post, thank you. Hopefully more leftists will read things like this and think about what “leftwing” really stands for. As a former leftist I can attest that a lot of brainwshing is involved in subscribing to that belief system.


40 posted on 06/10/2009 8:44:05 PM PDT by BerkeleyRefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson