True, but he was a white who was pro-white, if he was a white who was anti-white those opinions that would have made him left-wing.
Check out his website, he doesn't sound lefty. Of course he isn't in any sense a movement conservative (to the extent movement conservatives still exist.)
When you understand the history of progressivism, you see that being a white supremacist racist goes hand in hand with being a progressive.
Woodrow Wilson, “the father of progressivism,” was a profound racist, as an example.
What Wilson loved was accumulating massive federal power. And then using that power to pursue his agenda.
Until the 1960s, the Democratic Party stood for racism. And then all of a sudden they switched. Why? Cynical me, I think it was so they could exploit blacks as a political voting bloc.
When you look at the Civil Rights Act of 1964, you see a LOT of fierce Democratic opposition. Howard Smith (D-VA) kept it bottled up in committee and vowed to keep it that way. Richard Russell (D-GA) launched a filibuster against it. Senator Robert Byrd (D-W VA) spoke on the Senate floor for 14 hours opposing it. Two Republicans and two Democrats rewrote the bill so that Republicans would vote in enough numbers to overcome the Democrat’s filibuster.
And then all of a sudden Democrats - the original Ku Klux Klansmen - became the party dedicated to civil rights for blacks, and Republicans - the party of Lincoln founded to oppose slavery - became the villains.
All that said, it is very easy to be a white Democrat who views blacks as “monkey children” who need support and guidance from their superiors, and be a liberal Democrat in good standing.
Robert Byrd - former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan - is STILL a liberal Democrat in good standing.