I did not put it all off on Bush, I put it on the whole republican party as well. The whole party spent too much and grew the size of government when they controlled congress. They all decided to squander billions on the mistake of invading Iraq. They all accepted the influence of special interest money. Both parties are corrupted by a political system which is broken and under the influence of special interest money and it will not get fixed in an environment dominated by corrupt liberal media. What part in that mess is my responsibility?
Since you ask,
George Bush did not protect our borders - especially with Mexico. George Bush is a good man with good intentions but he was incompetent as president and he, with his republican party weasels brought about the complete disaster of Barak Osama/Obama.
As far as Iraq is concerned, we never should have thrown away the political and material resources to invade a country on the other side of the world because of what they might have done with what they might have had. Iraq posed so little threat to this country compared to other sources that it was one the worse decisions in world history to commit such critical resources to that fiasco. Iraq might come out better off, but the USA is obviously not better off because of that ill advised effort (ie. president Obama). It is not our place to be the policeman of the world - see the founding fathers.
Spoken like a true Ron Paulistenian.
The only thing "ill-advised" in acting to prevent another and even worse attack like 9/11 was the whining weasels behind Ron Paul and the leftist cabal of the Democrats.
The constant drone of undermining of both Bush and some Republicans, who were ousted by some puritan ethic of some Republicans, played right into the leftists hands, giving them reason to keep up the attack, as per Saul Alinksy's Rules for Radicals #4, #5, #8 & #11.