The case had nothing to do with the eligibility clause of the Constitution. You want to apply it there to suit your wishes but it does not. 14th Amendment style citizenship (anchor-baby) has no bearing on the Constitutional requirement for president. Show me one place in this ruling that it says it was redefining the eligibility clause. You can’t because it does not exist.The case determined that an anchor-baby is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. The Constitution says only NATURAL BORN CITIZENS can be President. Ergo...anchor babies can be President of the United States.
It's not complicated.
You seem to ignore the simple fact that the judge was not ruling on the eligibility clause of the Constitution. The case had nothing to do with that. You are just making that part of this up to suit your own wishes.
ROFL