I say it is.
I'm a FReeper too.
Sure you are. Just like you're a "lifelong Republican but..." More like a seminar FReeper.
Not all FReepers agree with you on this. In fact, I'll warrant that most of us don't.
You're the one that's in the minority, not me.
Read the damn 110 year old ruling.
Irrelevant to whether or not Zero is eligible for POTUS.
You don't know what you are talking about. It's embarrassing.
Uh, ok.
THe Constitution NOWHERE says you have to have two natural born citizen parents to be a natural born citizen.
It doesn't have to state it. Writings and other subsequent interpretations by the Founders validate my argument. P> If it were so, it would mean that you have to be the direct decendant ON MOTHER'S AND FATHER'S SIDE of a couple in the US in 1789.
The Founders grandfathered themselves in. Was Obama born in 1789?
Because if you come from immigrants since then NONE OF THEIR DECENDENTS could ever be a "natural born" citizen. It's ludicrous.
Was Obama's father a legal immigrant of the U.S.? Was he one of those idyllic immigrants who came here and became naturalized?
His communist, alcoholic, skirt-chasing old man was born in Kenya, you effing doorknob! He was a British citizen and per the 1948 British Nationality Act his citizenship automatically transferred to Zero. It does not matter where Obama was born, he held dual-citizenship loyalty which is prohibited under the Constitution for POTUS!
His communist, alcoholic, skirt-chasing old man was born in Kenya, you effing doorknob! He was a British citizen and per the 1948 British Nationality Act his citizenship automatically transferred to Zero.Wong Kim Ark was born of TWO chinese non-citizen parents. The SCOTUS declared him a natural born citizen.
Who cares if Britain recognized Obama as a citizen? Who cares if China did? What the Iranian parliament declared that it recognized everyone in the state of Michigan to be a citizen of Iran? Would that invalidate their American citizenship?