It SPECIFICALLY states that McCain and Palin do meet the Constitutional requirements for the job.
Why does the simple fact the the ORIGINAL documents said 0bama was Constitutionally qualified AND THEY REMOVED THAT STATEMENT before submitting the documents, not impress you as significant?
Someone posted upthread that some states required certification, and some states do not. Therefore there are two forms. Before I get too excited about this...Does anyone know the law regarding this??? Anyone??
It does impress me as very significant but we already went over this months ago on the BC thread. This isn’t new news. I don’t recall what the outcome was. I hate it when news organizations jump the gun. I like to have all of my evidence, then make my case or not. I think we need a copy from each state or at least more than Colorado. I also would like to see Bush’s and Clinton’s. The FReeper rollingstone is saying this means nothing. I haven’t seen his proof yet, but it seems to me when we discussed this months ago, obviously we decided there was an explanation or we wouldn’t have dropped it, right? UNLESS we just totally dropped the ball and moved on before we reached a conclusion.