[rocco55]

Question. I saw 2 prior docs (reportly as copies of the originals) over the week-end with missing Constituional clause. Kerry’s and Gore’s:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19712996/Kerry-2004-Cert

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19712995/Gore-2000-Cert

Were these real or have they since been debunked ?

[rxsid]

They, appear, to be legit:

"Reverse Analysis: Why Did Hawaii Get A Different DNC Certification Than Other States?

Since the 2000 and 2004 certifications do not appear to include the “legally qualified” language, investigators now need to focus their attention on why the “legally qualified” language was inserted in the DNC certification to Hawaii.

Perhaps we’ve been looking at the question backwards? We need to find out whether the DNC certifications sent to Hawaii in 2000 and 2004 contained the “legally qualified” language or whether Hawaii received the same DNC certification as the other states.

If Hawaii - prior to the 2008 election - received the same DNC certification as the other states then we will truly be onto something. If the “legally qualified” language was in the prior certifications given to Hawaii by the DNC in 2000 and 2004 then this is probably a non-issue."

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/reverse-analysis-why-did-hawaii-get-a-different-dnc-certification-than-other-states/