Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MD Governor says AG is investigating ACORN video
Inside Charm City ^ | 9/21/2009

Posted on 09/21/2009 3:08:27 PM PDT by jeffq73

Baltimore Sun:

A spokeswoman for Attorney General Doug Gansler said the probe will "involve everything," although she declined to say whether it includes the videos, which could constitute a violation of Maryland's two-party consent law.

The article mentions that Gansler asked permission to initiate the investigation from Governor Martin O'Malley, whose office made the announcement via a press release. Neither O'Malley's or Gansler's website has a news release or other announcement about the ACORN probe as of yet.

ACORN's spokeswoman told the Sun they "welcome" the investigation as a way to clear their name.

Previously, Gansler had said the ACORN videos made in Baltimore “are no more relevant to us…than a murder that takes place in Florida..."

Gansler also previously refused to remove an ACORN link from his office website. Local State's Attorney Patricia Jessamy refused to investigate ACORN, saying any potential evidence in the video may have been illegal obtained, and threatened to prosecute the makers of the video.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: acorn; douggansler; gansler; hannahgiles; martinomalley; maryland; rico
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2009 3:08:27 PM PDT by jeffq73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jeffq73
What???? A democRat Party coverup of leftist corruption in the Glorious Democratic Peoples' Republik of Maryland?????

Shocking, I tell you!

2 posted on 09/21/2009 3:11:54 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73

The MD Dems trot out this “consent” law only when it is useful for prosecuting conservatives. Isn’t it a violation of the Due Process Clause to intentionally enforce a law unevenly for purely partisan purposes?


3 posted on 09/21/2009 3:12:20 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73

I’m going to guess that these will have to be removed as I can guarantee they didn’t get permission from all parties on the cameras.

http://www.chart.state.md.us/TravInfo/trafficCams.asp


4 posted on 09/21/2009 3:16:44 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73

I expected nothing less. They go after those who expose them.


5 posted on 09/21/2009 3:17:29 PM PDT by Radio Free American? (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Oh what’s this I found? Baltimore uses “an aggressive Red Light Camera program”.

http://www.ci.baltimore.md.us/government/transportation/redlightcameras.php


6 posted on 09/21/2009 3:18:00 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73

Maryland will not do more than go through the motions against ACORN. They will only do that under duress.


7 posted on 09/21/2009 3:18:21 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73
While I don't think they will prosecute these two young film-makers, the tapes themselves will have no evidentiary value at trial - clearly, they were obtained illegally, or so any competent defense attorney will argue, successfully.

Without those tapes, any prosecution of Acorn based on these specific instances, becomes highly problematic for the prosecution.

The tapes have had tremendous, perhaps unprecedented, political impact, but any criminal prosecution (of ACORN) seems unlikely, at least based on these particular outrageous activities in the ACORN offices.

8 posted on 09/21/2009 3:21:02 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred

Oh dang

http://www.webcamlocator.com/united_states/maryland.htm


9 posted on 09/21/2009 3:21:34 PM PDT by Domandred (Fdisk, format, and reinstall the entire .gov system. I am Jim Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73; FlingWingFlyer; altair; stephenjohnbanker; youturn; little jeremiah; ~Kim4VRWC's~; ...
ACORN Ping!

FReep mail me if you want on/off the list.


10 posted on 09/21/2009 3:23:09 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar (A mob of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
"I’m going to guess that these will have to be removed as I can guarantee they didn’t get permission from all parties on the cameras."

It's not the video that's problematic, it's the audio - at least that's the way the Maryland statute is written and has been applied in prior cases.

11 posted on 09/21/2009 3:23:31 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SilvieWaldorfMD

merlin ping


12 posted on 09/21/2009 3:25:02 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73; xzins; blue-duncan; Kolokotronis; wmfights; Forest Keeper
I just read that law and it looks like it is only illegal to intercept a telephone call or to secretly tape a telephone conversation. I don't see how it applies to recording a conversation in which you are present with another person in the same place.

And if this is a "two party" consent law, wouldn't the fact that Hannah was present and was consenting to being taped be sufficient?

13 posted on 09/21/2009 3:25:49 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This is an actual investigation of ACORN, the context about the consent law was from the Sun’s larger article.


14 posted on 09/21/2009 3:32:35 PM PDT by jeffq73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
"I just read that law and it looks like it is only illegal to intercept a telephone call or to secretly tape a telephone conversation."

Here's the relevant section of the law...

" Willfully disclose, or endeavor to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subtitle;"

Phone calls are covered as electronic communication. In-person conversations is an oral communication.

15 posted on 09/21/2009 3:32:46 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Radio Free American?

I expected nothing less. They go after those who expose them.
++++++++++++++++++

Right. Nothing said or even intimated about the SERIOUS illegal activities going on with the ACORN staff...

What’s a good citizen left to think? That the government of Maryland is complicit with such illegal acts?

What a think to teach our kids??!

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!


16 posted on 09/21/2009 3:33:00 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try RAT PRESS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

What a think to teach our kids??!
++++++++++++++

What a thing to teach our kids...


17 posted on 09/21/2009 3:34:08 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try RAT PRESS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Maryland will not do more than go through the motions against ACORN. They will only do that under duress.
+++++++++++++

Right.


18 posted on 09/21/2009 3:36:31 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country & the Tea Party! Take America Back! (Objective media? Try RAT PRESS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jeffq73
UPDATE WBAL.com did receive the Governor's release (which is still not on his official site):
GOVERNOR O’MALLEY GRANTS ATTORNEY GENERAL AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE ACORN ANNAPOLIS, MD (September 21, 2009)- Governor Martin O’Malley announced today that he has granted the Office of the Attorney General the authority to investigate, and if appropriate, prosecute conduct involving the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). Earlier today, Maryland Attorney General Doug Gansler requested the authority to investigate allegations of the events surrounding ACORN. The Governor granted the authority pursuant to Article V, §3 of the Constitution of Maryland. The Office of the Attorney General is authorized to use all necessary subpoena powers, to present to an appropriate grand jury any evidence and testimony considered necessary to carry out this authorization and directive, and to act with the full powers, rights and privileges possessed by a State’s Attorney. If criminal conduct is uncovered by this probe, the Office of Attorney General is authorized to bring and to prosecute appropriate charges in any court of this State against any and all persons and entities involved in or associated with the crimes. ###
WBAL.com also reported the following:
The Governor has given the authority for the Attorney General to investigate the activities of ACORN in Baltimore. The move comes after hidden camera video surfaced in Baltimore and across the country of ACORN employees giving advice to a man and woman posing as a pimp and prostitute. Members of Maryland's Senate Republican Caucus sent a letter to the Governor last week requesting he have the State Prosecutor investigate the organization. O'Malley's office says the AG requested the authority today. Attorney General Gansler's office tells WBAL Radio, "ordinarily as we stated this falls in the jursidication of the local prosecutor. As time when on it became clear the local authorities were not going to pursue the matter. It was obvious someone needed to look into it."

19 posted on 09/21/2009 3:47:49 PM PDT by jeffq73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Maryland State’s Attorney in Baltimore caught on tape praising Obama (Huge Obama Supporter)

All Here:

http://hotairpundit.blogspot.com/2009/09/states-attorney-in-baltimore-who-would.html


20 posted on 09/21/2009 3:47:54 PM PDT by Talkradio03 (Talkradio03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson