[cherry]

this is a dead horse, unfortunately....we could get a Supreme Court ruling saying that zero is not technically the prez and we would then get the rats to make new law that allows it....ala Mass. rat party and the Senate seat.....

I wish it weren't so...but there it is....

[pissant]

LOL. Not quite.

[bobby.223]

try again young’n.

[sourcery]

Given such a ruling by the SCOTUS, the US military would have the final de facto say regarding who is, or is not, POTUS. Based on past history, they would probably back the SCOTUS. They probably wouldn't have to do anything other than state that, based on the SCOTUS ruling, they no longer recognize Obama as Commander in Chief. Were that to happen, the debate would be over (with apologies to Al Gore.)

[EDINVA]

No LAW can overturn the Constitution. If the Dems want to amend the Constitution, it would have to pass not only in the Congress but with 2/3 of the states’ legislatures.

[meadsjn]

Not even close.

[wastoute]

Of course, as you say, if we were able to get the SCOTUS to say he was ineligible the Rats would just pass a law making him so. The point is we need to make them do it.

Μολὼν λάβε

[opentalk]

Too bad the author said he is done investigating. Seems like he is even discouraged that no one can be held accountable.