No,the issue is that you are such a jealous idiot that you try to draw moral equivalence between that and the wrongdoings of the Obama Admin. That's no my words. That's yours. And given your admission that Malkin won't publish you on Hot Air, it reveals what you are about. Petty jealousy.
That’s incredibly vital. It’s the main reason why outside of Malkin almost no one will speak to her. It’s why Beck and no one on Fox News will have her on.
Funny, I did a Google search, and without even trying I found that she was on Hannity bac in September. Here's a hint - lying about someone in your blogs is a far worse journalistic offense than what you are complaining about with Malkin.
She doesn’t mention that the person accusing Project Vote of wrongdoing before they “discovered” the wrongdoing, first they applied falsely for a credit card, then used it for personal items, then had Project Vote fire them, then they turned around and accused Project Vote of wrong doing. That paints a much different picture than saying Anita Moncrief is a whistle blower.
So tell us, then - when a mobster turns states evidence, does that mean his testimony is worthless?
Using your logic, it would be.
Here's a hint - instead of trying to make yourself look bigger by attacking Malkin and Ed Morrisey, make yourself better instead. Trust me, you have a long, long, long ways to go to reach that point, so you'd better get started.
I never said she shouldn’t user her, but she needs to mention everything. If someone is using a mobster as an informant, do you think it would be proper not to mention that.
I didn’t say anything about Obama. I have posted plenty of anti Obama articles. Because Malkin writes against Obama, that gives her the right to dismiss basic journalistic ethics. It doesn’t. She can’t simply dismiss pertinent information about a source. She can’t. You can’t be allowed to call someone a whistle blower everytime you talk about them but then not mention that the same person stole and misused a credit card and only after they were fired did they become a whistle blower. Remember, Moncrief didn’t report on any corruption while collecting a pay check from Project Vote. By that, it looks a lot more as though Moncrief has an axe to grind. If Malkin still believes her that’s fine, but it’s not her job to misconstrue. If she wants to use her information, she can but she must give the whole story so that the audience can decide whether or not to believe it. That’s what she must do.