Note page 10 discussion on electricale energy cost between nuclear and wind and solar.
To: CHICAGOFARMER
2 posted on
12/22/2009 6:31:27 AM PST by
Cacique
(quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
To: CHICAGOFARMER; Delacon; SteamShovel; SolitaryMan; grey_whiskers; IrishCatholic; Darnright; ...
3 posted on
12/22/2009 6:31:39 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(This space for rent.)
To: CHICAGOFARMER
Excellent. A very interesting read, but don’t let Al see it. He’ll try to get us to blow up the sun.
4 posted on
12/22/2009 7:06:15 AM PST by
Jedidah
To: CHICAGOFARMER
Required reading for the climate debate. A slam dunk for me!
5 posted on
12/22/2009 9:03:08 AM PST by
yeetch!
(The end is near.)
To: CHICAGOFARMER; Jedidah
I like the conclusions on page 12. Al, Harry, Nancy, IPCC and Kyoto are all debunked.
6 posted on
12/22/2009 9:06:42 AM PST by
shove_it
(old Old Guardsman)
To: CHICAGOFARMER
The correct title of this study is “Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide”.
7 posted on
12/22/2009 9:11:49 AM PST by
shove_it
(old Old Guardsman)
To: CHICAGOFARMER
Take a bit of time to read this study. It pulls it all together.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
