What I see are freepers bitching about the RINOs, complaining that there needs to be no more compromises on principle, stating that the RINOs’ days are done and that Perry and KBH are RINOs at best. At the very best.
Establishment candidates. One who promised to change Washington but was instead changed by Washington.
The other...Texas vote for him then spend three years wondering why?
At least those are what the ads say.
Medina comes in with nearly the exact positions that the Conservative freepers want, but that isn’t good enough.
She lacks the experience the RINOs have and for some, although she was far clearer and less ambiguous that the RINOs, she didn’t state her positions in the most perfect absolutes to please every freepers.
Now she steps in the 911 truther excrement pile and can’t get the stench off of her whether she deserves it or not.
And, imo, that was the excuse that a lot of freepers needed to retain a ‘safe’ establishement candidate while talking about change.
I’m not trying to win votes for anyone. Just pointing out how when the time came to support a candidate with the most Conservative platform that freepers refused to do so.
In freeperland, if you can’t agree with someone then they are automatically nutcases. Or worse.
I like Perry because of his stand on life and family issues. He really understands that life begins at fertilization and believes that the family is the basic unit of society. He pushed for parental notification, the Woman’s Right to Know Act and for stricter ID for the guardian of minors seeking abortion. Even the Gardasil Executive Order included instructions to make it easier on parents who wanted to opt out of mandatory vaccines.
That being said, Medina has no record of working for legislation in Austin, sued the Republican Party of Texas for following the rules we voted on in our Convention, plays the race card based on her husband’s family, and hangs out with Alex Jones and Libertarians. Even before her implosion on Beck, she didn’t look like a Republican to me, and had already stated that she wouldn’t back either of the other candidates if she lost. We have no evidence that she can achieve any of her agenda, because she has never worked any legislation through Austin and has only served as a spoiler for the RPT in the past.
Who wants a Governor who SUSPECTS that the Federal Government and the NYPD was involved in the destruction of the twin towers and subsequent deaths of 1,000’s of people?
Do you? I MEAN DO YOU?????
Wake up!!!!! If she CAN JUSTIFY such as this in her mind, then what couldn't she justify???
Scary, scary stuff