Your position that you don’t want morality is absolutely a *moral* position. Deciding how to act on and arguing for right and wrong are most certainly acts based on moral positions.
You don’t like vaccines - or expect a physician to not like vaccines? Tell all the blind children who had measles, all the infants born with mental retardation due to mom’s catching Rubella while she was pregnant, tell the infertile boys due to Measles, mumps, and Rubella. Tell the victims of “lock jaw,” who never got their tetanus shots.
And, if you’d read the article, you’d see that the Governor also told the Department of Health and Human Service to make it *easier* to opt out of mandated vaccines. That the Legislature had passed law making it a burden to opt out - people had to file paperwork to access the paperwork and had to do it each year, for each child.
You don’t like vaccines - or expect a physician to not like vaccines? Tell all the blind children who had measles, all the infants born with mental retardation due to mom’s catching Rubella while she was pregnant, tell the infertile boys due to Measles, mumps, and Rubella. Tell the victims of “lock jaw,” who never got their tetanus shots.
And, if you’d read the article, you’d see that the Governor also told the Department of Health and Human Service to make it *easier* to opt out of mandated vaccines. That the Legislature had passed law making it a burden to opt out - people had to file paperwork to access the paperwork and had to do it each year, for each child.
Wow, that made no sense.
I don't like when people's rights and personal liberties are infringed upon. I expect physicians not to shove their bias and morality down peoples' throats.
It's not the state's business to require and fund the vaccination of young girls for STD's, whether it had an opt out clause for religious purposes.