Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT; Fred Nerks
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building.

He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Ping

23 posted on 03/30/2010 8:48:45 AM PDT by GOPJ (Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

I saw a post here earlier that said that he was president of the law review not editor.


29 posted on 03/30/2010 8:56:29 AM PDT by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: GOPJ
This is how the sub-standard Obama was able to make Editor:

Until the 1970's the editors were picked on the basis of grades, and the president of the Law Review was the student with the highest academic rank. ... That system came under attack in the 1970's and was replaced by a program in which about half the editors are chosen for their grades and the other half are chosen by fellow students after a special writing competition.

He did it on a popularity contest. Exactly how he became President of the US, no qualifications or exceptional abilities, but very popular.

31 posted on 03/30/2010 9:01:46 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson