[Phil_GA]

Phil,
Read your post. However your information doesn’t add or subtract from WND report. WND reported that Mr. Tim Adams believes personally that Soetoro is eligible to be president.

You’ve only given credibility to Mr. Adams assertions that he was told and discovered for himself that Soetoro was not born in Hawaii and, and there is no birth certificate at all.

WND did not characterize Mr. Adams as a birther. Your assertion that they did is false.

At this point you’ve managed to uncover your own biases by what you called the full disclosure.

At this point verify before trust is my motto for your information.

Then I suppose it's a good thing that I don't create postings to make everyone happy, now, isn't it?

Setting the snarky-ism aside for a moment, the bottom line is that I have only ever claimed that WND insinuated (and fully italicized this for emphasis in my posting just prior to my sharing email information from Mr. Adams) that, somehow, whatever Mr. Adams ran across, this should lead any reasonable person to assume that this contracted elections officer (a position of which I don't know is actually true to begin with) is confirming that Mr. Obama is, by extension of not having a birth certificate (original WND report), ineligible for the presidency. That is, in my view, WND's (here's that word again) insinuation, and definitely not Mr. Adams'.

I never claimed to be unbiased either; I only claim to stir the proverbial pudding and to knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true.

-Phil

[Alaphiah123]

Then I suppose it's a good thing that I don't create postings to make everyone happy, now, isn't it?

Setting the snarky-ism aside for a moment, the bottom line is that I have only ever claimed that WND insinuated (and fully italicized this for emphasis in my posting just prior to my sharing email information from Mr. Adams) that, somehow, whatever Mr. Adams ran across, this should lead any reasonable person to assume that this contracted elections officer (a position of which I don't know is actually true to begin with) is confirming that Mr. Obama is, by extension of not having a birth certificate (original WND report), ineligible for the presidency. That is, in my view, WND's (here's that word again) insinuation, and definitely not Mr. Adams'.

I never claimed to be unbiased either; I only claim to stir the proverbial pudding and to knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true. -Phil

Huh?!?

Phil you don't get it. It's not about making anyone happy. It's about factually relaying information which WND did. By your own admission you strain at gnats only to swallow camels. In other words while you're attempting to, "knock down perceptions that might not necessarily be completely true." What you actually did was allow your own bias to construct the false premises that you claim to fight against. Ergo creating a loop ad infinitum of your own mistrust and misinformation.