[Phil_GA]

No... reporting by definition is the unbiased relaying of the facts. You have disqualified yourself several times just in this string alone by admitting that you are bias.

That's right, I forgot: once any journalist leaves college, they are all 100% statistically unbiased.

Mmmmkay.

It is an interesting paradox that you've created here. You, who just admitted that you aren't perfect, are looking to point out imperfections in others. And you've been doing this since 2008? Years of hypocrisy is not impressive or becoming Phil

My postings are "not impressive or becoming," to whom, you? As I've already said, I'm not out here to make everybody happy. I'm here to post what I think is worth posting based on what I know at the time. Once again, this is otherwise known as "reporting."

This particular exchange has been fun, but I'll give you the last word (I figure you'll probably take it, whether given or not).

-Phil

[Alaphiah123]

No... reporting by definition is the unbiased relaying of the facts. You have disqualified yourself several times just in this string alone by admitting that you are bias. That's right, I forgot: once any journalist leaves college, they are all 100% statistically unbiased. Mmmmkay.

You still don't get it do you Phil reporting by definition is the unbiased relaying of the facts;what, where, when, why and how.
Any first year journalist knows this. Your non sequitur was not an answer merely a display of your deep misunderstanding of what you are doing.
It is obvious to anyone who as had even a smidgen of formal journalistic training that what you are doing is not reporting.
What is not impressive Phil is your bias pointing out what you perceive as bias that's not impressive Phil but I sure you wouldn't understand that either. Regards, Al