Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: unseen1

Having said all that, I think Plain looks like she might need to bone up on some of the legal issues and jargon. (ex. She seemed to stumble at the meaning of Napolitano’s question about “nullification.”)


119 posted on 06/15/2010 4:56:52 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216
correction

Plain...?

Palin

(I'm keyboard-challenged)

121 posted on 06/15/2010 5:17:02 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216
nullification is one of those loaded words. Palin wisely stayed away form embracing that word and instead placed it within the 10th amendment discussion.

Nullification was the word tossed around by the South during the run up to the Civil War. Any politician that embraces the word nullification stands a great chance of being branded a racist and/or a person living in the past.

the “stumble” you notice was more a matter of trying to reframe the question without the word nullification. IMO

127 posted on 06/15/2010 9:30:00 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson