The question is will the spread beyond the internet?
The problem with Mr. Adams’ statement is that he has seen as many Obama Birth Certificates as I have: zero. He claims to have knowledge that other people in a position to know have said that none exists. I don’t see how that evidence ever gets into any court. So, how does this advance the ball?
WE need names!!!
Will they back up his statements?
Phil, it seems your only interest in FR is to drive hits to your blog/news site.
Perhaps if you participated in the threads you would be taken more seriously.
Well, let’s take this a little further.
If he says that he heard other people say things about Obama’s birth certificate, that would probably be considered hearsay by any judge.
BUT.
If he is willing to name names, and to say WHO said what to him, then these people with direct knowledge of the evidence could be called on to testify, by the judge or by the complainant.
On 11 June 2010, Phil_GA claimed that World Net Daily “.....only got half of their story right....”
Phil_GA claimed that WND had implied that Tim Adams, the former senior elections clerk from Hawaii, was a “Birther.”
In fact, the 10 June 2010 WND news story that Phil_GA attacked clearly stated that Tim Adams was a Hillary Clinton supporter.
In fact, the 10 June 2010 WND news story that Phil_GA attacked clearly stated that Tim Adams thought Barack Obama was constitutionally eligible to be President.
Either Phil_GA did not read the original WND report, or Phil_GA deliberately lied about its content.
ping
The proper action is to notify the attorney representing Terry Lakin (and other Plaintiffs where this may be relevant evidence), and suggest forwarding a subpoena.
Thanks for update, Phil.
And thanks for posting at FR since I generally stop here first to see what’s new on eligibility front.
Rose