Posted on 07/22/2010 7:40:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
I also agree with the author. Breibart has done some admirable stuff in the past, but he devalued his brand here.
Yep. If he was unable to view the entire source material, and unable to share with his readers the provenance of the tape, he shouldn't have released it.
What's the net effect of this, it has destroyed whatever credibility Brietbart had built for himself, at least in the short-term. Also, whatever comes out later about this woman and how she obtained her job, will be discounted.
Breitbart went well above and beyond what liberals do in truthfully explaining the context.
"You know, I haven't seen such a mean-spirited people as I've seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn't it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush's and we didn't do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President.
Sherrod never should have gotten a job at the USDA in the first place. The job was an extortion payoff that was part of her $13 million race-baiting shakedown of the agency.
She is a race-baiting shakedown artist and her advocates and defenders on FR should take a closer look at this woman before going liberal batcrazy over her.
There was adequate context in Breitbart’s original video* that plain-as-day I understood Sherrod’s epiphany. I found the change in her perception of the man needing her help from “white” farmer to “poor” farmer touching. I even fantasied that maybe there was a Martin Luther King unifier in Ms. Sherrod.
The real racism depicted was in the NAACP crowd reaction to the early parts of her narrative where she remembers mocking and planning to screw Whitey. They affirmed her.
The repetition of the lie that Breitbart and Big Government removed all exculpatory context is driving me nuts. It was there. WAAAAAAAAAAAAA. Leave Andrew alone!!!
*http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/07/19/video-proof-the-naacp-awards-racism2010/
My thoughts exaclty.
Shirley Sherrod, the $13 million dollar race-baiting shakedown artist thanks you for your support.
You don’t know what you’re talking about. Do you love it when Rush or Glenn Beck are taken out of context? If you do, you should be consistent. Otherwise you’re no different than the opposition.
Snicker.
>>Whatever the circumstances are (or are not) of her hiring, her firing was unfounded.
Actually, given her “rich vs. poor” class warfare mentality as revealed in this speech, along with the fact that she’s an agent for a Governmental entity I don’t think should even exist with a budget that has been quoted at over $1B, I don’t have a problem with her firing. And that has nothing to do with any racism, or lack thereof, on her part.
I also think we need to know more about this lawsuit settlement with the agency that hired her. That’s clearly an odd thing.
No way. Not now. Not ever. The woman is a racist, viewing the world through brown-tinted glasses. To this day — as she made clear in her self-serving tale — it is still “my people” against “them” honkies. Unless, of course, the honkies are poor women, then her version of God has told her it’s alright to treat them like humans (though, of course, “my people” know that they are not).
Can we call off the cannibalism? Andrew Breitbart did the world a service by exposing the ugly virulent reality known as black racism. Hand the left his scalp, and the rest of our heads will follow next.
Carter L. Clews
Ron Radosh, you’re a tool. Get bent.
I would agree that AB should be a bit more careful about this kind of thing in the future. Not because I think he did anything wrong, but because of how we start every game down 3 touchdowns.
His point was the AUDIENCE REACTION to her story, long before they knew the story was going to come ‘full circle’ to a story of racial reconciliation; they were applauding her not helping someone and instead sending him to “one of his own”.
This was NEVER about Sherrod. It was about the NAACP’s REACTION to her story of racism. They hooted and applauded. It was about outing the NAACP’s racism. The left is again reframing the debate and the right, is again, falling for it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.