Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

fire at will ...
1 posted on 07/25/2010 7:45:03 AM PDT by j.argese
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: j.argese

I’m not sure what part of “the conservative model” requires passive acquiescence to all affronts. That has never been part of my model, and I don’t know of any other conservatives who live by that model.


2 posted on 07/25/2010 7:48:20 AM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese

Since you have all the answers, I expect to see your ass on the line. What ballot are you on?

If you’re not running for an office, then you are another “perfect candidate” resting on their butts telling everyone else what the problems are but offering no solutions. In other words, worthless.


3 posted on 07/25/2010 7:50:11 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese

The Conservative model isn’t about passive letting things happen, that is actually a liberal model- waiting for someone else (usually the government) to do the job that you should be doing. Conservative at its core is about the individual, thus, a true Conservative individual wouldn’t be passive in any of these instances, they would be active- not demanding government fix the problems, but taking a proactive-approach to each of these.

Don’t like how your kids are being taught, change their schools or teach them yourself.

Don’t like what is happening with elections, run for an office, become a poll watcher, or become active in the community.

Etc, etc..


4 posted on 07/25/2010 7:51:56 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese
"While you were working to provide for your family, your children were indoctrinated by government schools."

Not if you never bought into the scam of secular humanism and sent your children to private religious schools. If more did that, the NEA's monopoly would come to an end.

5 posted on 07/25/2010 7:52:28 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese

The failure is the American voter.


17 posted on 07/25/2010 8:11:45 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese

While you were working and paying taxes, half the US population was made exempt from paying income taxes (And if they did not earn enough, they were given free money by the IRS, under the Earned Income Credit).


23 posted on 07/25/2010 8:55:22 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - The anti-American dictator disguised as a President. Repeal Obamaism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese
August 25, 2010 | j.argese

You wrote this a month in the future?

Way cool!

Before you come back to this time, can you look up and freep mail me me the winning Powerball lottery ticket numbers for the July 27th, 2010 drawing?

24 posted on 07/25/2010 9:40:23 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese
We can continue our minority majority status and applaud our micro-victories or we can change our strategy.

So...what is your strategy?

I mean, besides accusing and pigeonholing everyone on here while making many assumptions without any validation.

25 posted on 07/25/2010 9:45:06 AM PDT by Allegra (I am not humblegunner...and Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: j.argese

I agree wholeheartedly with the above sentences. We’ve had the “creeping socialism” for YEARS, courtesy of Both “political party Rulers” (notice, even the RINO’s that continue at the helm). It’s taken Obama and the radicals to wake up more than Freepers. I think the TeaParties are testament to that.


29 posted on 07/25/2010 1:03:17 PM PDT by radioone ("The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PhatHead; Anitius Severinus Boethius; mnehring; HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; bmwcyle; Bob; ...
I'd like to start off by thanking you for your comments and criticisms. All were valuable in helping to establish a starting point for future projects.

I didn't list my solutions because I wanted to see responses to my observations, not to ideas put forward. Maybe I'm missing something or my decoder ring is out of date but I couldn't define the current Conservative model any other way but passive. If anyone could provide an example or two, I'd be receptive.

I keep hearing about the need to educate about Conservatism. Well, someone again pointed out the 2 to 1 identification ratio so our work should be done, let's go fishin'. Well, actually we can't do that because electoral results don't bear that statistic out, does it? We might start by discovering how people define Conservative vs conservative.

more to follow

35 posted on 07/26/2010 5:52:28 AM PDT by j.argese (Liberal thought process = oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson