Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lil Flower

So if you have a patient with terminal cancer, and you discover she’s getting chemo, you wouldn’t deny her services? Be honest.


12 posted on 08/13/2010 9:42:21 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: BykrBayb
Yes because medicare guidelines state that if a patient is seeking treatment (chemo) they don't qualify for hospice. And if you keep that patient on hospice, medicare will make you pay that money back plus a hefty fine. However, that same patient would qualify for home health. Now, you CAN have a pt on hospice if they are receiving chemo for palliative/comfort such as, if the pt has a throat cancer and radiation and or chemo would shrink that tumor to allow the pt to swallow. But a pt should not be referred to hospice until there is no hope/treatment left that will cure and or the pt does not want any further curative treatment. A company that admits a pt who is not terminal is committing fraud.
13 posted on 08/13/2010 9:57:53 AM PDT by Lil Flower (The destruction of America: It's a "big f*ckin deal"~to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson