Please, this accusing people of being trolls simply because they disagree is a bit much. Reasonable conservatives should be able to disagree about Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, LDS, NRA or any other high profile person or organization without throwing around accusations of being a troll. Group Think is for the other side.
Reasonable conservatives should be able to disagree about Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, LDS, NRA or any other high profile person or organization without throwing around accusations of being a troll.
I don't see the attacks on Glenn Beck as being anywhere close to reasonable. If taking cheap shots his struggle with alcoholism, denigrating his message on 8/28, ignoring the contributions to the Special Operations Warrior Fund doesn't qualify someone to troll status, I don't know what does.
I've witnessed more garbage directed at Beck for his rally than I've seen for the charade of Sharptons rally here on FR. Frankly, that's sick and disgusting. Idiots on this Forum that have more in common with Chris Matthews than with Glenn Beck should embrace being called trolls.
It wasn’t a disagreement about supporting Beck or not, it was the troll’s blatant misstatement of what Beck’s position on collective redemption was, support him or not.