So question is, if you and I agree that killing someone to take their property is wrong, but another person comes along and thinks it’s perfecting fine, is he objectively wrong, or is he just like the person who prefers pork.
For me it is not self evident that killing someone is the same as eating pork (although Muslims may believe these two are very close).
I feel like I need a refresh course in logic to debate the issue.
I am a simple person. All I am saying it is not so easy to agree even on things that seem self-evident for many of us - like God, do not kill, do not eat pork etc.
Muslims believe God spelled the Koran to Mohammed. If we agree that jihad is wrong - can we be objectively right?