From what I understand, Bush set the increase as a goal, but not as a mandate. He did come out against the reckless way F&F were going about it.
thank you
Isn’t asking for an increase in mortgages F&F underwrite quite differnt than asking for more regulation and you can have both, underwriting more loans BUT making sure the loans are not shaky
Did Bush say, ok increase it to 54% on risky loans?
It seems like they are apples and oranges