[conimbricenses]

So in other words, you will not answer a simple question about who you voted for in the 2008 primary because you know that person is guilty of the same things you accuse Paul of being a "fraud" over, and probably far more so.

Thank you for proving though that you argue not from a rational position, but from a bizarre and inconsistently applied personal fixation on Paul.

[reasonisfaith]

I volunteered for the Thompson campaign.

You have no argument, based on what I’ve already told you.