1 posted on
11/04/2010 1:41:23 AM PDT by
Gum Shoe
To: Gum Shoe
2 posted on
11/04/2010 1:44:34 AM PDT by
spokeshave
(Islamics and Democrats unite to cut off Adam Smith's invisible hand)
To: Gum Shoe
3 posted on
11/04/2010 1:50:44 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
(posted a total of 1,600 threads and 9,503 replies.)
To: Gum Shoe
4 posted on
11/04/2010 2:03:12 AM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Muslims are not the problem, the rest of the world is! /s)
To: Gum Shoe
Be aware they did this in NH, and will attempt to choose the GOP
(least possible of winning) candidate in 2012.
5 posted on
11/04/2010 2:08:36 AM PDT by
MaxMax
(Conservatism isn't a party)
To: Gum Shoe
"
Knowing their candidate couldn’t win, and preferring a RINO over a proven conservative, I believe a large number of democrats “crossed over” to support the Murkowski write-in candidacy."
I suspect that this is exactly what has happened.
There's something mighty fishy
going on in Alaska.
6 posted on
11/04/2010 2:26:50 AM PDT by
Semper Mark
(Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
To: Gum Shoe
I hope all the write-in voters misspelled McCloskey’s name. Or was it Betty Jo Bioloski?
7 posted on
11/04/2010 2:27:35 AM PDT by
Rocky
(REPEAL IT!)
To: Gum Shoe
I am as disgusted with this whore as I am with Charlie “whore” Crist.
8 posted on
11/04/2010 2:39:24 AM PDT by
chilltherats
(He was born with a roaring voice, and it had the trick of inflaming half-wits against their betters)
To: Gum Shoe
It is behavior I expect in a liberal socialist, not a republican.Au contraire. This is exactly what I expect from Republicans if we dont get a handle on it.
10 posted on
11/04/2010 3:43:37 AM PDT by
03A3
To: Gum Shoe
"Knowing their candidate couldn’t win, and preferring a RINO over a proven conservative, I believe a large number of democrats “crossed over” to support the Murkowski write-in candidacy." This doesn't exactly make her a "cheater" though, does it? The general election electorate and a primary electorate are two different things. If you don't believe me, talk to Ned Lamont.
To: Gum Shoe
Knowing their candidate couldn’t win, and preferring a RINO over a proven conservative, I believe a large number of democrats “crossed over” to support the Murkowski write-in candidacy. Isn't that what elections are all about? Voting for the candidate that you think will serve you the best? It seems that you are arguing that Democrats did just that... and for doing so, they are wrong.
13 posted on
11/04/2010 4:06:20 AM PDT by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: Gum Shoe
>>> She is the next self promoting ...
What politician is not self-promoting?
>>> loser ...
Early indications are that she has won. Else what would be the point of this blast ?
>>> in the parade of blue-blood republicans ...
Class warfare? Really? John Edwards would be proud.
>>> willing to do whatever it takes to stay attached to the government teat.
Such as getting more votes then the next person.
c’mon
15 posted on
11/04/2010 4:39:39 AM PDT by
tlb
To: Gum Shoe
23 posted on
11/04/2010 5:27:03 AM PDT by
McGruff
(A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs)
To: Gum Shoe
We have to deal with her, and make SURE she opposes the DREAM amnesty during lame duck. I liked Joe Miller, but he royally screwed up by fighting tooth and nail the release of his work records until the week before the election, when he should have just revealed all that on a Friday afternoon after he won the primary.
26 posted on
11/04/2010 6:22:49 AM PDT by
montag813
(http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
