[Westbrook]

There are a lot of inconsistencies in the voting.

Those inconsistencies are being resolved in Murky’s favor.

I, for one, am bloody sick and tired of losing races by razor thin margins to enemies of the Constitution.

Besides, I thought Alaska had a sore loser law that would prevent primary losers from running as independents.

Which primary loser from the Tea Party ran as an independent?

None that I know of.

Murkowski’s seat was ENDOWED to her by her father in a supreme act of nepotism. That ALONE should disqualify her her in principle, if not in law.

Again, how anybody, I mean ANYBODY could cast a vote for such a hiedously corrupt, morally bankrupt person, I’ll never know, but there were Americans who actually cast votes for the creep clown Franken.

What stupid people.

They should be ashameed of themselves for having such a disregard for the blood of fallen heroes who gave up their lives to defend the Constitution and the PRINCIPLES upon which it is based.

Limited government.
Citizen officeholders.
Accountability.
Responsibility.
Love of Country.
Allegiance to the Constitution.

Murky has NONE of these qualities. She is an endowment queen, treating a Senate seat aa though it were her birthright.

Democrats voted for Murky just to be sure that Miller would lose. They knew their candidate was toast, so Murky’s independent run was just what they needed. They get a Democrat who caucases with the Republicans.

[SeattleBruce]

“Democrats voted for Murky just to be sure that Miller would lose. They knew their candidate was toast, so Murky’s independent run was just what they needed. They get a Democrat who caucases with the Republicans.”

Just like RINOs are - McLame, Graham cracker and the rest of ‘em - enemy moles in the midst of our camp. And they’re blatant and proud of it.

[beckysueb]

Democrats voted for Murky just to be sure that Miller would lose. They knew their candidate was toast, so Murky’s independent run was just what they needed.

BINGO!