Posted on 11/14/2010 10:15:54 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Of course he knew what was in store. But yes, the melodramatics over it were ill received by me as well, also the uptick in sales of his DVD as a newsworthy event not adequately covered in the media don't kindly predispose me towards the guy. ME ME ME, look at ME! ;)
Well, to be fair, both viewers had appointments with their PO's at airtime this week.
Cheers!
As for *THINKING* about Palin?
I was on board before you.
Note the date on the first one -- BEFORE the RNC speech.
Cheers! Cheers!
What are you, twelve? Running around the site collecting my quotes like a little teenager with nothing better to do with your time?
I couldn’t care less if you were ‘on board’ before I was—my whole point, if you’d learn to read, is that I came around RECENTLY.
Stop whining and crying because you don’t like that I posted facts about O’Donnell.
So just BEING an atheist makes me a troublemaker?
You so love scrolling through my posts, I challenge you to cut and paste every comment you can find where I comment on God and Christianity.
You won't do it, because I always defend Christianity, and never, ever push atheism on a pro-God site.
What a nervous, scared little troll you are, holding grudges and whining because someone dares have an opinion different than yours.
Now go cry to the mods, like usual when you can't discuss like an adult.
And I took that claim seriously enough, that I went back, verified it, and posted the results backing up that claim.
If I were a troll, I'd not have done that.
As far as O'Donnell -- it's not *what* you posted, but the tone involved : and with it the implication that "conservatives can't win" and the secondary, implied corollary that it's better to go with RINOs whenever possible.
Cheers!
When you have to lie, you've lost.
Shouting 'Troll!' like a child is the ultimate dodge, and you use it all the time.
I never, ever, ever said or implied "conservatives can't win" and that it's better to go with RINOs whenever possible.
You are a liar, and a whiney brat who cannot debate facts.
Now go whine to someone else, I only talk to those who are honorable and honest. You are neither.
Have you the ability to see that all you ever have to use against me is personal invective, while you hide passive-aggressively behind your "child" and "Cheers!" stuff?
By your definition a troll is someone who doesn't like your lies, yet you are free to write silly, pouting, personal posts--while you have said NOTHING about the actual ISSUE.
Cheers, you frightened, emotional child who's here for personal silliness instead of discussing issues.
Rather the opposite: taking your word for it that you have come around on Palin, linking to posts which back up your claim, and including those I originally *PING*ed on the topic, is neither personal invective nor passive-agressive.
"Child" is in lieu of more inflammatory language, samples of which can be seen in some of your more recent posts to me.
"Cheers!" is something I close the majority of my posts with, and have done so for years.
By your definition a troll is someone who doesn't like your lies, yet you are free to write silly, pouting, personal posts--while you have said NOTHING about the actual ISSUE.
I covered that, too, when I posted a couple of articles I *wrote* here on FR within two weeks of Palin's nomination to the GOP ticket. These articles covered the ISSUE of Palin's likely appeal.
Cheers, you frightened, emotional child who's here for personal silliness instead of discussing issues.
...hit a nerve, did I?
Slainte!.
Trivial counterexample, excerpted from here:
Forget what Karl Rove said on one TV show—I blame O’Donnell, whose foolishness provided HUNDREDS of hours of television mockery of Republicans.
I think it can be argued that she did a lot more damage than Rove by being a constant reminder of media cliches about conservatives. Are any of those bitching about Rove have the intellectual honesty to consider that she may have cost us control of the senate?
Recall that YOU used the words "never, ever, ever said or implied".
Therefore a single counterexample is sufficient for refutation.
Cheers!
(Oh, btw -- I noticed too that in post #29, to which I am replying, you said,
Now go whine to someone else, I only talk to those who are honorable and honest. You are neither.
...but then your post #30 in the same thread was addressed to me too.)
Ta ta for now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.