High School Football Player Gets Penalized For Pointing To God

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIi2H4zMZW8 ^ | December 2, 2010 | Brittany Pounders

[Salamander]

It's all about the ostentatious affectations, you know.

;]

[Hatteras]

"The Fighting Irish outperform most secular teams."

LOL! You weren't paying attention during the Charlie Weis era.

[Tzfat]

What we really need is a dedicated group of Freepers who will post such things with increased frequency - maybe it will drive these few “disturbed” and “offended” content-Nazis to seek help. Clearly, their meds aren’t working.

[paulycy]

[humblegunner]

The content isn’t the issue, you learning-impaired cretin.

It’s the claiming of other’s work as their own that makes video blogpimps unpalatable.

Try to pay attention.

[Tzfat]

The content isn’t the issue, you learning-impaired cretin.

Give it a rest. I am concerned for your health.

[Tzfat]

Your tirades accomplish nothing except the opposite of what you think. You give more traffic to the threads, and thus the bloggers that so offend you. Now that is funny.

No soup for you!

[wagglebee]

Your tirades accomplish nothing except the opposite of what you think. You give more traffic to the threads, and thus the bloggers that so offend you. Now that is funny.

You are obviously unfamiliar with blog pimping. Blog pimps really don't give a damn if how many people visit a thread on FR, they are only interested in people clicking the link to the blog (hence the excerpt after a dozen words or so).

The problem with the blog pimps is that they actually harm the bloggers out there who actually have something to say and can do it without claiming that copywritten material that belongs to someone else is their own.

[Tzfat]

The problem with the blog pimps is that they actually harm the bloggers out there who actually have something to say and can do it without claiming that copywritten material that belongs to someone else is their own.

You are fighting a losing battle. This is the Internet. It has no rules, and sites that do have content rules (like FR), recognize that it is the Internet, and wasting time putting fingers into a a dam that has already burst is not only silly, it borders on insanity.

If you support "bloggers that actually have something to say" - your content-Nazi ways here in FR aren't selling it well. Instead of gaining support for your "cause," folks like humblegunner frothing at the mouth and spewing filth remove all credibility you might otherwise have.

[humblegunner]

sites that do have content rules (like FR), recognize that it is the Internet, and wasting time putting fingers into a a dam that has already burst is not only silly, it borders on insanity.

1. Scroll back up, see post 70.

2. Note who posted it. Click the link.

3. Crawl back in your n00bie hole.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

clueless

[Tzfat]

Note who posted it. Click the link.

Hmm. And yet, the thread is not locked, the poster not banned.

Keep insulting. It is wonderfully effective. For the record, I have been around a lot longer than you.

[humblegunner]

For the record, I have been around a lot longer than you.

Not too good with dates, are you?

Tzfat

Blogpimp apologist since Nov 1, 2009

view home page, enter name:

~ About ~ Links ~ Contact ~ In Forum ~ Mail To ~

Return

[Tzfat]

I visit many sites. I have many handles. I was around long before you.

[wagglebee]

You are fighting a losing battle. This is the Internet. It has no rules, and sites that do have content rules (like FR), recognize that it is the Internet, and wasting time putting fingers into a a dam that has already burst is not only silly, it borders on insanity.

It's pretty obvious that you don't know what you're talking about.

Do you even know what copyright infringement is?

If you support "bloggers that actually have something to say" - your content-Nazi ways here in FR aren't selling it well.

This sentence makes no sense. Is English your first language?

Instead of gaining support for your "cause," folks like humblegunner frothing at the mouth and spewing filth remove all credibility you might otherwise have.

First of all, humblegunner and I disagree on A LOT of stuff and we've gone at it a bunch of times over the years.

Secondly, whether you finds me credible is of no consequence to me.

Finally, my "cause" has nothing to do with ridding the world of blog pimps.

As I said, I don't have an issue with legitimate bloggers. I don't have a blog, but there are certain blogs (written by people who are actually recognized authorities in their fields rather than some anonymous basement-dweller who fancies himself as an authority on everything from macroeconomics to Old Testament prophecy) which I regularly post (and by post I mean the WHOLE thing and not just a sentence fragment) and HG has never accused me of being a blog pimp.

[humblegunner]

I was around long before you.

Yeah. Lots of weak-arsed n00bs claim that.

Funny thing, though.. none can prove it.

So. What were you banned for in this theoretical previous incarnation?

You're admitting to being a retread? Hmm. Interesting.

[MortMan]

Spokane, Oregon is down the road from Aural, Washington.

[wagglebee]

For the record, I have been around a lot longer than you.

Really? What are some of your other FR names?

[Tzfat]

It has to do with my employment and my previous choice for a handle.

But if I had first signed up today, I could recognize your the clinical nature of your comments in a split second.

[wagglebee]

Funny thing, though.. none can prove it.

Actually, I had a retread who proved it a couple weeks ago, then Jim nuked him.