Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: beandog
Like I said, I don’t believe he was embellishing the story. You just chose to take it that way.

I didn't take it any way other than the way he said.

What is wrong with you people? He said she sat in the big middle of people's filth and she obviously didn't.

There was no need to embellish. No need to aggrandize what she did. No need make it sound like she's some blockhead who sits down in people's crap and vomit.

What she did was noble enough without throwing in things that obviously didn't happen.

34 posted on 12/20/2010 1:57:34 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle

Oh no. He did say she sat with the suffering in the midst of their filth. That’s what he said. That’s what she did. That was his point - she has compassion. Clothes can be changed and hands can be washed. You can even be treated for Cholera if you get it. She was focused on bringing relief and hope to the hurting. She saw people - not filth.


40 posted on 12/20/2010 2:02:48 PM PST by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Texas Eagle

She “obviously” did not sit in the middle of “it”. And on what do you base that claim? The fact that you would never do such a think yourself? You’re no Sarah Palin.


41 posted on 12/20/2010 2:07:04 PM PST by ritpg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson