That Obama's father wasn't a citizen was no secret. It is in his autobiographies; everyone knew it. Yet no one claimed before his election that this disqualified him from being a Natural Born Citizen: none of his primary opponents raised this issue; McCain and Palin disn't raise the issue in the general election; not one member of the Electoral College objected; not one member of Congress raised any objection when they certified the electoral votes; Chief Justice Roberts didn't object to swearing Obama into office. During the entire primary and general election campaign, not one lawyer or law professor wrote an op-ed or a letter to the editor claiming that Obama wasn't a Natural Born Citizen. Not one conservative legal organization (American Center for Law and Justice, Pacific Legal Foundation, Judicial Watch, etc.) ever said this was an issue. No conservative media person ever said that Obama wasn't constitutionally qualified to be elected. The only court to have addressed the merits of the eligibility issue (the Arkeny case) said that two citizen parents are not necessary to be a Natural Born Citizen. I would therefore put the odds of any court ever agreeing with your definition at exactly zero.
Yeah, I know, but can I have the "over?"
This is a problem. I would say that perhaps 35% of my fellow citizens flat out agree with my position, i.e., that "Natural Born Citizen," status requires both parents to be citizens.
At the very least, I would "hope" that 1 state will make this an issue. It is a valid Constitutional question that must be answered.
What next? The offspring of two illegal aliens running for POTUS?