Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: sussex

He is absolutely, 100% correct. She is a reality TV star who can raise tons of cash for conservatives, but she is not presidential material.


19 posted on 02/04/2011 10:32:04 AM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Astronaut

What is “presidential material”? Would you say Obama is of “presidential material”? If so, I’d rather have Sarah Palin.


21 posted on 02/04/2011 10:40:05 AM PST by no_go_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Astronaut

Let us see: 1) Sarah Palin’s father wasn’t wealthy and didn’t keep her (and his other children) out of the Vietnam War with faux deferments; 2) she didn’t go to Yale since he didn’t (and couldn’t) ease her way past Admissions to the Ivy League; 3) she doesn’t curry support from conservatives yet dump all over them to curry favor with the press after using them to get elected; 4) she doesn’t criticize the really fine and successful President who selected her as Vice-President when his electoral career was otherwise at a total end; and, 5) she’s not dumb as mud and has never gotten us into a foreign war that cost 5,000 wonderful lives, cost over $ 1 trillion, and redounded to the prime benefit of Iran. Yes, she is really, totally unlike the Bushes so she can’t possibly be considered a serious candidate for President.


22 posted on 02/04/2011 10:41:32 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Astronaut

I tend to agree with you regarding her ability to raise $$$. Although this is pure speculation on my part, the electorate may not yet be ready to accept a female as POTUS.


37 posted on 02/04/2011 12:54:23 PM PST by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson