You're missing the obvious point. Spokesbabe Okubo showed the jpg she received from Poltifact to Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. He had the perfect opportunity to say, "Yes, I signed this birth certificate." Obama was already a local celebrity at the time he would have signed it, so he should have known whether he signed it or not. Instead, you leave out the part of the Poltifact story that exposes Obama's COLB as fraudulent.
"When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it."
Still, she acknowledges: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
The registrar (Onaka) thought he could see "pieces" of the embossed image??? Again, he should have known if he signed it or not. This was only a year later. If he has to look for pieces of an embossed seal, he obviously didn't sign it and it's not genuine.
Also, Spokesbabe Okubo looks like a total idiot when she says, "Because they scanned the front
you wouldnt see those things." Do we need to repost the DeCosta COLB to show how stupid that statement is??
He misses the point on purpose. He’s an Alinsky disruptor, and he’s trying to confuse people, obscure the issues and burn up valuable resources.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2678076/posts?page=316#316
You’re missing the obvious point. Spokesbabe Okubo showed the jpg she received from Poltifact to Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. He had the perfect opportunity to say, “Yes, I signed this birth certificate.” Obama was already a local celebrity at the time he would have signed it, so he should have known whether he signed it or not. Instead, you leave out the part of the Poltifact story that exposes Obama’s COLB as fraudulent.
“When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.”
Still, she acknowledges: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”
The registrar (Onaka) thought he could see “pieces” of the embossed image??? Again, he should have known if he signed it or not. This was only a year later. If he has to look for pieces of an embossed seal, he obviously didn’t sign it and it’s not genuine.
Also, Spokesbabe Okubo looks like a total idiot when she says, “Because they scanned the front
you wouldnt see those things.” Do we need to repost the DeCosta COLB to show how stupid that statement is??
Believe it or not, on October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino actually stated that THIS individual had “statutory authority” to maintain and oversee Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that this individual was THE legal custodian of Obama’s “original birth certificate” just FIVE days before the 2008 U.S. Presidential election:
Yep. SHE SAID THIS PERSON:
She sure did. And as Dr. Fukino stated, this person had it on record “in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
Not in accordance with regulations. Not in accordance with law:
…in accordance with policies and procedures, like the policy and procedure of filing a ‘Late Birth Certificate.’
So, let’s look again at her statement. On October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino issued the following:
That’s right. Incredibly, just five days before the election, Obama’s “original birth certificate” was NOT “valid” or in the custody of the ‘State Registrar,’ Dr. Fukino, herself, said it was in the custody of the “Registrar.”
And if the “Registrar” had custody of the record, Alvin T. Onaka would not and could not certify a copy of it with his signature.
So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar .or perhaps he had a record that had been rejected by the State Registrar entirely.
And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”