Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Dr. Onaka is still in the same job. He can be asked at any time if the stamp of his signature is on Obama’s COLB.

You're missing the obvious point. Spokesbabe Okubo showed the jpg she received from Poltifact to Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. He had the perfect opportunity to say, "Yes, I signed this birth certificate." Obama was already a local celebrity at the time he would have signed it, so he should have known whether he signed it or not. Instead, you leave out the part of the Poltifact story that exposes Obama's COLB as fraudulent.

"When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it."
Still, she acknowledges: "I don't know that it's possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."

The registrar (Onaka) thought he could see "pieces" of the embossed image??? Again, he should have known if he signed it or not. This was only a year later. If he has to look for pieces of an embossed seal, he obviously didn't sign it and it's not genuine.

Also, Spokesbabe Okubo looks like a total idiot when she says, "Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things." Do we need to repost the DeCosta COLB to show how stupid that statement is??

132 posted on 03/03/2011 1:47:10 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

He misses the point on purpose. He’s an Alinsky disruptor, and he’s trying to confuse people, obscure the issues and burn up valuable resources.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2678076/posts?page=316#316


135 posted on 03/03/2011 2:01:27 PM PST by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: edge919

You’re missing the obvious point. Spokesbabe Okubo showed the jpg she received from Poltifact to Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. He had the perfect opportunity to say, “Yes, I signed this birth certificate.” Obama was already a local celebrity at the time he would have signed it, so he should have known whether he signed it or not. Instead, you leave out the part of the Poltifact story that exposes Obama’s COLB as fraudulent.

“When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.”

Still, she acknowledges: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.”

The registrar (Onaka) thought he could see “pieces” of the embossed image??? Again, he should have known if he signed it or not. This was only a year later. If he has to look for pieces of an embossed seal, he obviously didn’t sign it and it’s not genuine.

Also, Spokesbabe Okubo looks like a total idiot when she says, “Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things.” Do we need to repost the DeCosta COLB to show how stupid that statement is??


It sure would be great to get any or all of the involved under oath, wouldn’t it?
Rather than reporter’s interview questions, I woukd love to hear the answers to follow up questions asked in an adversarial proceeding.


136 posted on 03/03/2011 2:01:58 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

To: edge919

Proof. It Was in Front of Our Faces.

Believe it or not, on October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino actually stated that THIS individual had “statutory authority” to maintain and oversee Obama’s “original birth certificate,” and that this individual was THE legal custodian of Obama’s “original birth certificate” just FIVE days before the 2008 U.S. Presidential election:

Yep. SHE SAID THIS PERSON:

She sure did. And as Dr. Fukino stated, this person had it on record “in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

Not in accordance with regulations. Not in accordance with law:

 

Click for a larger view.

 

…in accordance with policies and procedures, like the policy and procedure of filing a ‘Late Birth Certificate.’

 

So, let’s look again at her statement. On October 31, 2008, Dr. Fukino issued the following:

Click for a larger view.

 

That’s right. Incredibly, just five days before the election, Obama’s “original birth certificate” was NOT “valid” or in the custody of the ‘State Registrar,’ Dr. Fukino, herself, said it was in the custody of the “Registrar.”

And if the “Registrar” had custody of the record, Alvin T. Onaka would not and could not certify a copy of it with his signature.

 

Excerpt from the published Vital Records Regulations. Click for a larger view.

 

So, now we have our answer. We know whether or not “Date Filed by Registrar” matters. It matters. A lot. Because Dr. Fukino said that the “original birth certificate” was in the “Registrar’s” custody. It was still in the procedural stage. And because someone other than the Hawaii State Registrar was custodian of Obama’s original birth certificate on October 31, 2008, we know that Obama did not have a valid original birth certificate and he possibly had an application for a ‘Late Birth Certificate’ on file that was pending acceptance by the State Registrar….or perhaps he had a record that had been rejected by the State Registrar entirely.

And if it was not in the State Registrar’s custody and under his authority, then his “original birth certificate” was not evidence to “date and place of birth and parentage.”

139 posted on 03/03/2011 2:38:49 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson