Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Scanian
HELLO WORLD!!

This mystery has been solved.

His BC was changed/amended to remove BO Sr. - His father on the BC is Lolo Soetoro

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

10 posted on 03/24/2011 2:07:50 AM PDT by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: expatguy

Ya Hiding behind adoption rules.thats it.


12 posted on 03/24/2011 2:10:47 AM PDT by Nooseman (mutt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: expatguy
His BC was changed/amended to remove BO Sr. - His father on the BC is Lolo Soetoro

Very plausible statement. I myself have a birth certificate that you are describing! My birth father left my mother when I was 3... my mother remarried... 10 years later I was "adopted" by my step father. We went through an adoption process in court and my birth CERTIFICATE was amended to remove my birth father and has my step father as my ORIGINAL birth father! It is as if my birth father never existed.

BO may have the exact same situation with his birth certificate.

25 posted on 03/24/2011 3:06:23 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: expatguy

Kudos for being the first to report on Barry’s early Indonesian years. But what exactly would be the motivation for spending great gobs of money on hiding the fact that his original BC was modified to make Soetoro his father?

Presumably, the available documentation contained in Hawaii would demonstrate that Senior was his real father, which is all that Obama has ever claimed. That is, in your version of events, there should be a sealed original BC (presumably viewable only under court order or if the individual named on the BC authorizes its release), along with a modified BC which in turn should have some sort of indication that it is an amended BC.

What interest is served by keeping all this hidden? Barry’s own account already has revealed his mom as a knocked-up out-of-wedlock teen whose 2 marriages failed and who essentially abandoned her only son into the the care of her parents so that she could pursue her career interests. In the context of that already extraordinarily unflattering portrait, why would Barry take such pains to hide the fact that she and Lolo evidently played a little fast and loose with Barry’s birth records? To spare her reputation? It makes no sense.


30 posted on 03/24/2011 3:14:24 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: expatguy

If that was the case, then the Hawaii DOH has been lying to us about the records they have. And it wouldn’t explain Obama’s secrecy. Being adopted by Lolo is neither disgraceful nor impacts his presidential eligibility. It actually fits his official narrative far better than anything else he’s claimed. I don’t see what his motive would be to hide that.

If the HDOH was accurate when they confirmed that Obama’s BC was amended in 2006, it wouldn’t have been possible for him to change the paternity where either Lolo or Obama Sr were involved because both men were already dead. Same thing holds true for Frank Marshall Davis, Malcolm X, and Stanley Armour Dunham.


81 posted on 03/24/2011 6:03:30 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson