Beam me to Planet Gore !
If an article is published in “Water, Air, and Soil Pollution” does that mean it is properly “peer-reviewed” and therefore valid, whereas if it is published in “Energy and Environment” it is unreliable “ignorance”? Let’s spend more money to teach people lies about the environment seems to be the point of this article - for example that the Himalayan glaciers will be gone by 2035. If not for skeptics that would be accepted as truth and taught to school children.
I see later in the thread the anticapitalists at RC back off from full support of the editorial, but don’t mention which parts of the screed they still support. The good news is that they are so in bed with anti-Americans like Soros that they will never gain any legitimate political support (however they will continue to get lots of media support and support from foundations and groups run by Soros and his ilk).