[mnehring]

No matter what you think of said device or product, the thought of federal oversight of it is infinitesimally more perverse.

[trumandogz]

“No matter what you think of said device or product, the thought of federal oversight of it is infinitesimally more perverse.”

Spot on.

The Nanny State Sycophants wish to have no limits on their power.

[ModelBreaker]

“...the thought of federal oversight of it is infinitesimally more perverse.”

Of course, the federal government wasn’t involved at all—until federal courts decided that the federal government had to override state law on the issue.

So I agree with what you said. But not what you meant.

[stevelackner]

I just wanted to make something clear, the cases mentioned did not involve federal oversight at all. They involved State laws in Texas and Alabama and how the respective federal appellate courts that encompass those States ruled about the laws within those States regarding bans on sex toys.

[stevelackner]

I just wanted to make something clear, the cases mentioned do not involve federal oversight at all (except the judiciary). The cases themselves involved State laws in Texas and Alabama and how the respective federal appellate courts that encompass those States would rule about the laws within those States regarding bans on sex toys.