I guess I have problems with the concept of parsimony, or, if you will, Occam’s Razor. Stanley Ann had a baby in Mombasa, but she took another baby back to the states? Every witness has her vehemently saying that Zero is the son of Barack, sr.
You are saying that Barack Hussein Obama was not used before 1980? I think not. As far as I can tell, he did go by Barack Obama in kindergarten and in that picture from 5th grade (?) in Hawaii that a classmate sent to the Zero to sign. I don’t have the documents in front of me, but I thought he was named thusly in the divorce documents. The Soebarkah document (possibly) references a change in name from Barack Hussein Obama to “Soebarkah”. The Seattle references may also support the Barack Hussein Obama, as Stanley Ann referred to herself as Mrs. Obama.
In my mind, the preponderance of evidence suggests that Stanley Ann had a child with Barack, sr in Mombasa. It seems like quite a stretch to imply that,somehow, this baby was left behind and another taken to the States.
Didn’t say she took another baby back to the United States.
I know of nowhere he used the name Obama in Kindergarten; He didn’t use the name on the photo with Scott until he signed it in the White House which is self serving.
The divorce documents use Junior for the name of the minor child but there is no evidence anywhere of any nature that Zero is the person referenced.
If the person on Capitol Hill was in fact Stanley Ann, she referred to herself as Obama but that doesn’t have anything to do with Zero.
I am not going to respond further to you. You need to understand that the point is that there is not yet any hard evidence to connect any of these names or name uses to the individual who presently occupies the White House under circumstances in which there is in fact evidence suggesting that he is not the person to whom the name was attached at birth.