Sorry...don't see it. However, I would say that about these pics.
Posted on 04/24/2011 1:22:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters
The lone Republican in the Hawaii State Senate told a radio interviewer today he believes "the real issue" stopping Barack Obama from releasing his long-form birth certificate is something the president has to hide, perhaps even the name of his actual birth father.
Hawaii State Sen. Sam Slom further told the host of "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on WABC 770 AM in New York City that so long as Obama refuses to be transparent about his past, questions about the president's birth remain "a legitimate issue."
"My particular point of view – and why I haven't identified myself as a 'birther,' per se – is that [Obama] probably was born [in Hawaii] and that the real issue is not the birth certificate, but what's on the birth certificate," Slom told Klein.
Asked what that could be, Slom said, "It could have to do with what his name is on the birth certificate, who is actually listed as his father, the citizenship of the father."
He continued, "My belief is that there is a birth certificate, he was born here, but that there is information that for reasons known only to him he doesn't want released. If it were just the birth certificate, that would be one thing, but it's his school records, it's employment records. … Why would anybody, let alone the president of the United States, spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep that hidden?"
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Or it means that no one named Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. But if Steve Dunham (or some other name), son of Frank Marshall Davis (or some other father) has a long form BC in Hawaii it would account for a number of things including Abercrombie's confusion on the issue, and Fukino's certainty on the issue.
We have pretty much exactly the same information about who is “really” the father for every other president. Same as for every other person, in fact, on whom a paternity test has not been done.
Statistically, there is an excellent chance one or more of our 40+ presidents has not been the biological son of his mother’s husband.
Luckily, the law does not care who the “real father” of the child of a married woman is. Her husband is by definition the legal father and it is almost impossible to get the law to recognize otherwise, even with indisputable DNA evidence.
IOW, obsessing about who Obama’s “real father” may be is an exercise in futility. The law just doesn’t care. It’s irrelevant.
Are you sure?
Possibly
I am waiting for the MSM to answer this, instead of labeling those that do as BIRTHERS.
Well she had the job at the bank and if they found out she had a black baby she might have got fired. It’s not like today.
_____________
So where was she during the pregnancy she was hiding? and where did she give birth to him? I really don’t think that is the case because I think he would have stayed in Hawaii and not gone to Indonesia. But who knows... the whole family is bizarre.
I know when I was born, and I have seen no evidence that indicates he was born in some other year.
I know everybody thinks they can get rid of the guy by finding the smoking gun, but you have to actually find the SG. (If it would even work then being still in question.)
There is an old science saw that applies here, “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.” IOW, that something is not adequately documented means only that there is inadequate evidence. It tells you nothing at all about what the truth might actually be.
I’ve worked for a lot of attorneys who did divorces. Never did we need to provide a marriage license to get the divorce. The Plaintiff files an affidavit swearing to the allegations in the divorce complaint, among those are the date of marriage. Usually the place of marriage isn’t even mentioned. If the Defendant would file an answer alleging the parties were never legally married, that would have been a different story. Not many people who aren’t married try to get a divorce.
LOL!Lame.... very lame... concern troll.
Obviously, if Gramps is actually Dad, mom must be a woman of color.
_______________
The barmaid that he talks about in his book. The one that worked at the bar that gramps frequented and took Barry along with him. While Gramps canoodled with the barmaid, Barry said( In the boook Dreams), that he sat there and looked at photos of naked women on the walls. What sort of bar was that? Obviously a dive.
Thanks, but what you are saying is that the plaintiff’s affidavit is accepted by the court as evidence of the marriage, unless contested.
IOW, evidence of marriage sufficient to satisfy the court is presented before a divorce proceeding begins. Which would make the final divorce decree evidence that a marriage had existed. At least until challenged and proven otherwise.
Oh please, they are referring to medical records, not birth records.
The post to which I originally responded referenced admission and other medical records, not birth records required by the state.
No one has yet posted any evidence that such records are available from HI hospitals for anybody for the period in question.
If such evidence is available, I’d like to see it.
he very much resembles his grandfather
One of the Stanleys was a donor in his creation, imho, based on photos. Not sure which one.
Obama is a crook. He said the other day he went to college on a scholarship. With his bad grades? What Scholarship? Word is that it was paid by the Saudi Royal Family.
People with any senses are fleeing for the Mainland.
What I’m saying is that HIPAA probably allows them to read and post the letter but not to directly confirm or deny its contents.
LOL, do you think I wrote the HIPAA law? Put the blame for the pretzel logic where it belongs, on Congress. They’re the ones who decided what providers can and can’t do with their patients’ information.
Why don’t you call or write to the hospital and ask why they read and posted the letter?
Yes
Sorry...don't see it. However, I would say that about these pics.
NO! Not according to our ruling tyrants in the judiciary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.