It's obvious that the difference in the rough and soft edges on the text got caught up in different layers. Look at the green background layer. It's not a static green pattern but has white lines carved out where the text should be. It's not like a Photoshop layer.
It's so obvious that this is the case, but I can see that the snowball is already rolling down the hill.
Enough is enough people. The guy was born in Hawaii.
Which OCR software creates clipping masks in addition to layers?
Please explain how OCR software could take the “Non” of the word “None” but not the “e”. I think that excuse is insufficient. I further believe that it’s a fake.
Please also explain how the digitally created green background was imported from the future to 1961, when there was no digitally created anything until the 90s.
Also explain why anyone would scan when a photo would not only suffice but be more believable.
just saying.